Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 58 Fragile Recovery
2020 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LESLEY JOHNSON Board President
JENNIFER BAKER Board President
MICHELLE KUCGINSKI Treasurer
ANGELA HOLMQUIST Secretary
LESLEY JOHNSON Board President
JENNIFER BAKER Board President
MICHELLE KUCGINSKI Treasurer
BRETT BAKER Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LESLEY JOHNSON Board President
JENNIFER BAKER Board President
MICHELLE KUCGINSKI Treasurer
ANGELA HOLMQUIST Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 121 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points below the peer median (5 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 41 over 5 years (declining by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.