Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

"Empowers children to share their voices through creative writing workshops, then adapts and performs their stories on stage with professional actor/educators for both school and public audiences."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller

Demonstrated Impact

  • creative writing workshops
  • in-school performances of children's stories
  • public performances
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
36
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 11.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 12.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 10.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MIKE LUBIN Board President —
DEANNA MYERS Board Member —
JACK REICH Board Member —
DORI SCALLET Board Member —
HARRISON WAYNE SMITH Board Member —
ALLISON SOKOLOWSKI Secretary —
MERISSA STEWART Board Member —
JENNIFER ALLMAN Board Member —
ASHLEY BLAND Board Member —
STEVE CROTHERS Treasurer —
MARY WINN HEIDER VICE PRESIDE —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER ALLMAN VICE PRESIDE —
SOPHIA AUDREY Board Member —
MARY WINN HEIDER Board Member —
MIKE LUBIN Board President —
DEANNA MYERS Board Member —
JACK REICH Treasurer —
DORI SCALLET Board Member —
ALLISON SOKOLOWSKI Secretary —
MERISSA STEWART Board Member —
RAVEN STUBBS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JILLIAN ABBINANTI Board Member —
JEN ALLMAN Board Member —
DAVID BOROWSKI Secretary —
TOM CUEVAS Board Member —
MARY FISHER Board Member —
JOHN GILMOUR Board President —
ERICA HALVERSON Board Member —
JOHN GILMOUR Board President —
MANDY JONES VICE PRESIDE —
MANDY JONES VICE PRESIDE —
JOE LEVERING Board Member —
ELIZABETH BULLOCK Secretary —
LIZ JOYNT SANDBERG Board Member —
MAURICIO SARDISCO Treasurer —
MAURICIO SARDISCO Treasurer —
JEN ALLMAN Board Member —
DAVID BOROWSKI Board Member —
IMRON BHATTI Board Member —
TOM CUEVAS Board Member —
ERICA HALVERSON Board Member —
EDDIE JOHNSON Board Member —
MARY FISHER Board Member —
JOE LEVERING Board Member —
KAYLA PULLEY Board Member —
JILLIAN ABBINANTI Board Member —
LIZ JOYNT SANDBERG Board Member —
COLETTE GREGORY EXECUTIVE DI —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 47 points below the peer median (10 vs. 57).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.