Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
37
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 1.8% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 2.3% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 1.7% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 1.8% 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 1.9% 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 3.1% 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 2.4% 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 2.8% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 4.2% 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 5.6% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 5.5% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 5.8% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARC R POULOS EXECUTIVE DIREC 1.8% of Rev
MARSHALL DOUGLAS CHAIRMAN
JEFFREY HORNE Board Member
DAVID SNELTEN Treasurer
JAMES M SWEENEY Board Member
ED KOCSIS Board Member
DAVID FAGAN Board Member
DAN AUSSEM Board Member
DEB TOPPERT Board Member
MIKE KRESGE Board Member
ERIC ENGLEKING Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARC R POULOS EXECUTIVE DIREC 1.8% of Rev
MARSHALL DOUGLAS CHAIRMAN
JEFFREY HORNE Board Member
DAVID SNELTEN Treasurer
JAMES M SWEENEY Board Member
ED KOCSIS Board Member
DAVID FAGAN Board Member
DAN AUSSEM Board Member
KEITH ROSE Board Member
DEB TOPPERT Board Member
MIKE KRESGE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARC R POULOS EXECUTIVE DIREC 1.5% of Rev
MARSHALL DOUGLAS Board Member
JEFFREY HORNE Board Member
DAVID SNELTEN Treasurer
JAMES M SWEENEY Board Member
ED KOCSIS Board Member
DAVID FAGAN CHAIRMAN
DAN AUSSEM Board Member
KEITH ROSE Board Member
DEBRA TOPPERT Board Member
MICHAEL KRESGE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARC R POULOS EXECUTIVE DIREC 1.5% of Rev
MARSHALL DOUGLAS Board Member
STEVEN M CISCO Board Member
DAVID SNELTEN Treasurer
JAMES M SWEENEY Board Member
ED KOCSIS Board Member
DAVID FAGAN CHAIRMAN
DAN AUSSEM Board Member
KEITH ROSE Board Member
DEBRA TOPPERT Board Member
MICHAEL KRESGE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARC R POULOS EXECUTIVE DIREC 1.5% of Rev
MARSHALL DOUGLAS Board Member
STEVEN M CISCO Board Member
DAVID SNELTEN Treasurer
JAMES M SWEENEY Board Member
ED KOCSIS Board Member
DAVID FAGAN CHAIRMAN
DAN AUSSEM Board Member
KEITH ROSE Board Member
DEBRA TOPPERT Board Member
MICHAEL KRESGE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 196 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (5 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.