Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | 23.3% | 39 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 36 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | 45.6% | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | 65.8% | 13 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | 26.2% | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | 49.1% | 19 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | 47.5% | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | 40.8% | 28 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | 35.1% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | 33.5% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | 31.8% | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | 32.4% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | 26.9% | 36 | Fragile | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANDREW WALLACE | Artistic Director | 27.9% of Rev | ||
| KATHERINE SOLVERSON | Board Member | — | ||
| LAURA TOMACIC | Board Member | — | ||
| LINDA KIRACIBASI | Board Member | — | ||
| BRYAN HALES | Board President | — | ||
| MONIQUE MAYE | Board President | — | ||
| VAN CROCKER JR | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANDREW WALLACE | Artistic Director | 23.3% of Rev | ||
| JULIE HILL | Board Member | — | ||
| BRYAN HALES | Board President | — | ||
| MONIQUE MAYE | Board President | — | ||
| VAN CROCKER JR | Treasurer | — | ||
| KATHERINE SOLVERSON | Board Member | — | ||
| LAURA TOMACIC | Board Member | — | ||
| LINDA KIRACIBASI | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMY BRANAHL | Artistic Director | 39.1% of Rev | ||
| TOM BECK | Board Member | — | ||
| SARA GREENSTEIN | Board Member | — | ||
| LINDA KIRACIBASI | Board Member | — | ||
| DEBRA HATCHETT | Board Member | — | ||
| KATHERINE SOLVERSON | Board Member | — | ||
| LAURA TOMACIC | Board Member | — | ||
| ANDREW WALLACE | Board Member | — | ||
| VAN CROCKER | Board Member | — | ||
| BRYAN HALES | Board President | — | ||
| MONIQUE MAYE | Board President | — | ||
| MARTHA KINZEL | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMY BRANAHL | Artistic Director | 52.2% of Rev | ||
| TOM BECK | Board Member | — | ||
| SARA GREENSTEIN | Board Member | — | ||
| LINDA KIRACIBASI | Board Member | — | ||
| MONIQUE MAYE | Board Member | — | ||
| KATHERINE SOLVERSON | Board Member | — | ||
| LAURA TOMACIC | Board Member | — | ||
| OSCAR ALCANTARA | Board President | — | ||
| BRYAN HALES | Board President | — | ||
| MARTHA KINZEL | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMY BRANAHL | Artistic Director | 51.2% of Rev | ||
| OSCAR ALCANTARA | Board President | — | ||
| TOM BECK | Board Member | — | ||
| MELISSA CORLEY | Board Member | — | ||
| SARA GREENSTEIN | Board Member | — | ||
| BRYAN HALES | Board Member | — | ||
| MARTHA KINZEL | Treasurer | — | ||
| LINDA KIRACIBASI | Board Member | — | ||
| MONIQUE MAYE | Board Member | — | ||
| KATHERINE SOLVERSON | Board Member | — | ||
| LAURA TOMACIC | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 9 points above the peer median (45 vs. 36).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 23.3% is modestly above the sector's healthy band (18–22%) — worth monitoring.
- Net assets declined for 3 consecutive years of deficit spending; cash runway narrowing.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.