Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sharon L Mason Board President
Sheilah C O'Grady Board President
Anthony J Zawila Jr Treasurer
Emil Zbella Secretary
Morgan Ayres Business Manager
Rose Murphy Board President
Jennifer Lenihan Board President

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wayne O Wendell Board President
Meg Massaro Board President
Diane Pojedynski Treasurer
Sharon Mason Business Manager
Camilla Joe-O'Keefe Publicity Chairman
Aron Arellano Social Chairman
Emil Zbella Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wayne O Wendell Board President
Meg Massaro Board President
Diane Pojedynski Treasurer
Sharon Mason Business Manager
Camilla Joe-O'Keefe Publicity Chairman
Aron Arellano Social Chairman
Emil Zbella Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 30 points above the peer median (65 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.