Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 9.7% 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 9.4% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 6.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 9.9% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 10.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 10.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ross Willits Executive Director 9.7% of Rev
Marty Marrone Board Member —
Kim Curtis-Monson Board Member —
Nathan Ertl Board Member —
Evonne Bilotta-Burke Board Member —
Penelope Hillemann Board President —
Brett Day Board President —
Russell Lane Treasurer —
Sophie Galep Secretary —
Lucy Weberling Board Member —
Dale Gruber Board Member —
George Rothenberger Board Member —
Edie Loy Board Member —
Rudolph Marti Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lucy Weberling Board Member —
Dale Gruber Board Member —
Jim Franczyk Board Member —
Mabel Houle Treasurer —
Roberta Podrug Treasurer —
Penelope Hillemann Secretary —
Shane Zack Secretary —
Jason Juran Board President —
Nicolas Hentges Board President —
Brett Day Board Member —
Phaedra Johnson Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nicolas Hentges Board President —
Jason Juran Board President —
Shane Zack Secretary —
Roberta Podrug Treasurer —
Brett Day Board Member —
Phaedra Johnson Board Member —
Lucy Weberling Board Member —
Dale Grubor Board Member —
Jim Franczyk Board Member —
Mabel Houle Board Member —
Penelope Hilleman Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nic Hentges Board President —
Jason Juran Board President —
Shane Zack Secretary —
Roberta Podrug Treasurer —
Brett Day Board Member —
Bill Lindroos Board Member —
Rudy Marti Board Member —
Dale Grubor Board Member —
Mark Anderson Board Member —
Mabel Houle Board Member —
Penny Hilleman Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 257 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.