Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 9.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 — — 7.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 3.1% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 4.8% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 3.7% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 5.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 1.8% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 5.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELE CLARK Board President —
BERT CROSSLAND Board President —
HARRY ENG Board President —
PATRICIA HARKIN GOVERNANCE C —
RAFAEL VILLAGOMEZ Board President —
ERIC LARSON Secretary —
TOM LONG Treasurer —
MARC THAYER Executive Director —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARC THAYER Executive Director 2.5% of Rev
R BERT CROSSLAND Board President —
BOB CHIAPPETTA Treasurer —
CARLOS CHAVEZ Board Member —
GENE CRUME Board Member —
JOYCE DLUGOPOLSKI Board Member —
ANDRE FIEBIG Board Member —
JENNIFER FUKALA Board Member —
MARTIN NOBS Board Member —
ARLYN TOLZMANN Secretary —
ERIC LARSON EX OFFICIO, EYS —
PATTY HARKIN Board President —
THOMAS LONG Board Member —
SAVITHA SUSARLA Board Member —
ROSS BEACRAFT EX OFFICIO, MUSICIAN —
TIM SHAFFER EX OFFICIO, MUSICIAN —
HERMAN ZWIRN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW GRAMS Board Member 4.4% of Rev
ERIK MALMQUIEST Executive Director 1.5% of Rev
R BERT CROSSLAND Board President —
BOB CHIAPPETTA Treasurer —
DAVE CONROY Board Member —
GENE CRUME Board Member —
JOYCE DLUGOPOLSKI Board Member —
ANDRE FIEBIG Board President —
JENNIFER FUKALA Board Member —
MARTIN NOBS Board Member —
RICHARD RESSEGUIE Secretary —
KAREN SCHOCK Board Member —
PATTY HARKINS Board President —
ARLYN TOLZMANN Board President —
ROSS BEACRAFT MUSICIAN REP —
TIM SHAFFER MUSICIAN REP —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID BEARDEN Executive Director 4.8% of Rev
R BERT CROSSLAND Board Member —
HARRY BLIZZARD Board Member —
JOYCE DLUGOPOLSKI Board Member —
KAREN SCHOCK Board Member —
LEO NELSON Treasurer —
ANDRE FIEBIG Board President —
GWENDOLYN GAGE Board President —
BRIAN LOVETERE Board Member —
JAMES MANFIELD Secretary —
RICHARD RESSEGUIE Board President —
ARLYN TOLZMANN Board President —
MARK KUNTZ Board Member —
CHARLIE SCHUCHAT Board Member —
ROBERT CHIAPPETTA Board Member —
PATTY HARKINS Board President —
DAWN KNIGHT Board Member —
MARTIN NOBS Board Member —
ERIK MALMQUIST Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 57 points below the peer median (0 vs. 57).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.