Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 9.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 7.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 3.1% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 4.8% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 3.7% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 5.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 1.8% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 5.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELE CLARK Board President
BERT CROSSLAND Board President
HARRY ENG Board President
PATRICIA HARKIN GOVERNANCE C
RAFAEL VILLAGOMEZ Board President
ERIC LARSON Secretary
TOM LONG Treasurer
MARC THAYER Executive Director

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARC THAYER Executive Director 2.5% of Rev
R BERT CROSSLAND Board President
BOB CHIAPPETTA Treasurer
CARLOS CHAVEZ Board Member
GENE CRUME Board Member
JOYCE DLUGOPOLSKI Board Member
ANDRE FIEBIG Board Member
JENNIFER FUKALA Board Member
MARTIN NOBS Board Member
ARLYN TOLZMANN Secretary
ERIC LARSON EX OFFICIO, EYS
PATTY HARKIN Board President
THOMAS LONG Board Member
SAVITHA SUSARLA Board Member
ROSS BEACRAFT EX OFFICIO, MUSICIAN
TIM SHAFFER EX OFFICIO, MUSICIAN
HERMAN ZWIRN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW GRAMS Board Member 4.4% of Rev
ERIK MALMQUIEST Executive Director 1.5% of Rev
R BERT CROSSLAND Board President
BOB CHIAPPETTA Treasurer
DAVE CONROY Board Member
GENE CRUME Board Member
JOYCE DLUGOPOLSKI Board Member
ANDRE FIEBIG Board President
JENNIFER FUKALA Board Member
MARTIN NOBS Board Member
RICHARD RESSEGUIE Secretary
KAREN SCHOCK Board Member
PATTY HARKINS Board President
ARLYN TOLZMANN Board President
ROSS BEACRAFT MUSICIAN REP
TIM SHAFFER MUSICIAN REP

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID BEARDEN Executive Director 4.8% of Rev
R BERT CROSSLAND Board Member
HARRY BLIZZARD Board Member
JOYCE DLUGOPOLSKI Board Member
KAREN SCHOCK Board Member
LEO NELSON Treasurer
ANDRE FIEBIG Board President
GWENDOLYN GAGE Board President
BRIAN LOVETERE Board Member
JAMES MANFIELD Secretary
RICHARD RESSEGUIE Board President
ARLYN TOLZMANN Board President
MARK KUNTZ Board Member
CHARLIE SCHUCHAT Board Member
ROBERT CHIAPPETTA Board Member
PATTY HARKINS Board President
DAWN KNIGHT Board Member
MARTIN NOBS Board Member
ERIK MALMQUIST Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (0 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.