Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
33
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 210.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 10.8% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 8.8% 53 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 53 Fragile Recovery
2017 33.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 44.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 56.2% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 56.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 36.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 54.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINC SMELZER Board Member 11.3% of Rev
LINC SMELZER Board Member 10.9% of Rev
Courtney Hanna-McNamara GENERAL MANAGER 8.1% of Rev
Courtney Hanna-McNamara GENERAL MANAGER 7.6% of Rev
TAMARA FARRELL Music Librarian 6.7% of Rev
TAMARA FARRELL Music Librarian 6.2% of Rev
LYNN HANSEN PERSONNEL MGR 1.6% of Rev
LYNN HANSEN PERSONNEL MGR 1.5% of Rev
DAVID SINASON Treasurer
GEOFFREY DECKER Board Member
ANN TUCKER Board Member
AMANDA NELSON Dir. Emerita
Victoria Young Board Member
Valerie Garver Board Member
KIRK LUNDBECK Grants Coord.
SALLY STEVENS Dir. Emerita
DEB LOITZ Music Ed OR Chr
BILL CUMMINGS Board President
FRANK BAZELI Dir. Emeritus
KEN OLSON Board President
TONI KRULL Board Member
GRETCHEN MOORE Board President
JERROLD ZAR Secretary
DAVID SINASON Treasurer
GEOFFREY DECKER Board Member
ANN TUCKER Board Member
AMANDA NELSON Dir. Emerita
Victoria Young Board Member
Valerie Garver Board Member
KIRK LUNDBECK Grants Coord.
SALLY STEVENS Dir. Emerita
DEB LOITZ Music Ed OR Chr
BILL CUMMINGS Board President
FRANK BAZELI Dir. Emeritus
Joci Hasson Intern
TONI KRULL Board Member
GRETCHEN MOORE Board President
JERROLD ZAR Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINC SMELZER Board Member 10.9% of Rev
KIRK LUNDBECK Grants Coord.
SALLY STEVENS Dir. Emerita
DEB LOITZ Board Member
BILL CUMMINGS Board President
FRANK BAZELI Dir. Emeritus
KEN OLSON Board President
TONI KRULL Board Member
GRETCHEN MOORE Board President
LYNN HANSEN PERSONNEL MGR
JERROLD ZAR Secretary
DAVID SINASON Treasurer
GEOFFREY DECKER Board Member
ANN TUCKER Board Member
AMANDA NELSON Dir. Emerita
TAMARA FARRELL Music Librarian
Courtney Hanna-McNamara GENERAL MANAGER
Victoria Young Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINC SMELZER Board Member 8.9% of Rev
KIRK LUNDBECK Grants Coord.
SALLY STEVENS Dir. Emerita
DEB LOITZ Board Member
BILL CUMMINGS Board President
FRANK BAZELI Us
KEN OLSON Grants Coord.
TONI KRULL Board Member
GRETCHEN MOORE Board President
LYNN HANSEN PERSONNEL MGR
JERROLD ZAR Secretary
DAVID SINASON Treasurer
GEOFFREY DECKER Board Member
ANN TUCKER Board President
AMANDA NELSON Dir. Emerita
TAMARA FARRELL Music Librarian
KELSEY CHELBERG GENERAL MANAGER
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 196 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 210.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.