Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — — 54 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden — 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kimberly Speckmann Board President —
Laura Corn Board President —
Asma Ali Treasurer —
Andrew Bozzelli Secretary —
Cristina De Leon Board Member —
Kevin Drucker Board Member —
Adam Gilbert Board Member —
Heather Mueller Board Member —
Martin Sarano Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kim Speckmann Board President —
Laura Corn Board President —
Andrew Bozzelli Secretary —
Asma Ali Treasurer —
Cristina DeLeon Board Member —
April Proter Board Member —
Athena Farrar Board Member —
Kevin Drucker Board Member —
Martin Sarano Board Member —
Adam Gilbert Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kim Speckmann Board President —
Laura Corn Board President —
Andrew Bozzelli Secretary —
Asma Ali Treasurer —
Cristina DeLeon Board Member —
April Proter Board Member —
Athena Farrar Board Member —
Kevin Drucker Board Member —
Martin Sarano Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stetson Atwood Board President —
Kim Speckmann Board President —
Andrew Bozzelli Secretary —
Kevin Drucker Treasurer —
Asma Ali Board Member —
Cristina DeLeon Board Member —
Melanie Hellenga Board Member —
April Proter Board Member —
Martin Sarano Board Member —
Laura Yocky Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 377 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 17 points below the peer median (50 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.