Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 4.3% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 8.3% 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 8.0% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 7.0% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 8.0% 42 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 9.6% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 7.4% 42 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 9.3% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 8.4% 40 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 10.5% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 6.8% 44 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHILLIP COLGLAZIER Executive Director 6.7% of Rev
EMILY SCHWARTZ KEIRNS Board President —
JUSTIN T MOLITORIS Board President —
BRIAN TERNET Treasurer —
MATTHEW BOOKER SECRETERY —
DAVID DYER Board Member —
LEE FUHR Board Member —
THOMAS MARCUCCILLI Board Member —
DR JASON ROW MD Board Member —
RENA SHOWN Board Member —
JEFFREY S SLATER Board Member —
STEPHANNY SMITH Board Member —
LINDSEY C SWANSON Board Member —
BRAD WANEK Board Member —
STEVEN K ZACHER Board Member —
MARGARET ANKENBRUCK Board Member —
CATHERINE CHRISTOFF Board Member —
JESSICA CRAFT Board Member —
SHARON EISBART Board Member —
SARAH GNAGY Board Member —
LINDSEY SHARP Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHILLIP COLGLAZIER Executive Director 7.5% of Rev
MERRY EWING Board President —
EMILY SCHWARTZ KEIRNS Board President —
AUDREY FRISON-ROBINSON Treasurer —
SUSAN CHIPPS Secretary —
ANDREW ABLES Board Member —
MARGARET ANKENBRUCK Board Member —
CHERI BECKER Board Member —
RENA SHOWN Board Member —
MICHAEL H GAVIN Board Member —
JASON KUCHMAY Board Member —
MARC E LEWIS Board Member —
JIM MCCANN Board Member —
JUSTIN T MOLITORIS Board Member —
TONY PATRICK Board Member —
MATTHEW REIBER Board Member —
DR JASON ROW MD Board Member —
SUZANNE M WAGNER Board Member —
JAMES VELEZ Board Member —
MARSHALL WEADICK Board Member —
DAVID BELEW Board Member —
DAVID DYER Board Member —
DANIEL HANSEN Board Member —
STEVEN K ZACHER Board Member —
GARY WOLF Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHILLIP COLGLAZIER EXEC. DIREC. 7.4% of Rev
MERRY EWING Board President —
EMILY SCHWARTZ KEIRNS Board President —
AUDREY FRISON-ROBINSON Treasurer —
SUSAN CHIPPS Secretary —
ANDREW ABLES Board Member —
MARGARET ANKENBRUCK Board Member —
CHERI BECKER Board Member —
RENA SHOWN Board Member —
MICHAEL H GAVIN Board Member —
JASON KUCHMAY Board Member —
MARC E LEWIS Board Member —
JIM MCCANN Board Member —
JUSTIN T MOLITORIS Board Member —
TONY PATRICK Board Member —
MATTHEW REIBER Board Member —
DR JASON ROW MD Board Member —
SUZANNE M WAGNER Board Member —
JAMES VELEZ Board Member —
MARSHALL WEADICK Board Member —
DAVID BELEW Board Member —
DAVID DYER Board Member —
DANIEL HANSEN Board Member —
STEVEN K ZACHER Board Member —
GARY WOLF Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 181 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.