Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
36
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 9.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2010 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2009 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2008 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLI FOY Board Member —
CHRISTIAN HELEM Board Member —
ERIC STODDARD Board Member —
RODNEY QUAINTON Treasurer —
RACHEL SLAVIC Board President —
AVANI SHAH Secretary —
WILL KENWORTH Board President —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLI FOY Board Member —
CHRISTIAN HELEM Board Member —
WILL KENWORTH Board President —
RODNEY QUAINTON Treasurer —
RACHEL SLAVIC Board President —
AVANI SHAH Secretary —
RACHEL SLAVICK Board President —
RODNEY QUAINTON Treasurer —
AVANI SHA Secretary —
WILL KENWORTH Board President —
KELLI FOY Board Member —
CHRISTIAN HELEM Board Member —
KELLI FOY Board Member —
CHRISTIAN HELEM Board Member —
WILL KENWORTH Board President —
RODNEY QUAINTON Treasurer —
RACHEL SLAVIC Board President —
AVANI SHA Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Schuette Board President —
Katherine Korey Board President —
Jim McGee Treasurer —
Yann Kulp Secretary —
William Kenworthy Board Member —
Rodney Quainton Board Member —
Rachel Slavick Board Member —
Christian Helem Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Schuette Board President —
Katherine Korey Board President —
Jim McGee Treasurer —
Yann Kulp Secretary —
William Kenworthy Board Member —
Rodney Quainton Board Member —
Rachel Slavick Board Member —
Christian Helem Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (20 vs. 57).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.