Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | — | — | 40.3% | 38 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 59 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 59 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 59 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie OHashi | Board President | 40.3% of Rev | ||
| Craig Grenvik | Board Member | — | ||
| Kathryn Cotton | Board Member | — | ||
| Shawn Casey | Board Member | — | ||
| Shelly Spratkies | Board Member | — | ||
| Nancy Sargent | Board Member | — | ||
| Don Day | Board Member | — | ||
| Jeff Tish | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 14 other orgs in WY with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 59 → 38 over 5 years (declining by 21 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 40.3% is well above the sector's 90th percentile (healthy band: 18–22%).
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 40.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~37 points.
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.