Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
23
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 34.8% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 35.5% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 2.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 5.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 3.5% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 10.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Vangeline Helene Gand Artistic Director 22.2% of Rev
Jane Friedman Board President
Paul Barlett Advisor
Amanda Caughey Secretary
Joanne Djele Board Member
Shoshana Green Advisor

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Vangeline Helene Gand Artistic Director 1.6% of Rev
Jane Friedman Board President
Paul Barlett Advisor
Amanda Caughey Secretary
Shoshana Green Advisor
Geoff Shelton Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Vangeline Helene Gand Artistic Director 2.1% of Rev
Geoff Shelton Treasurer
Jane Friedman Board President
Paul Barlett Advisor
Amanda Caughey Secretary
Shoshana Green Advisor
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points below the peer median (15 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 26 → 23 over 5 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 34.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~26 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.