Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLEY SPURGEON Board President
BONNIE ZIMMER VICE PRESIDE
CHRISTINE BOGAN Secretary
MICHELLE MURFITT Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARBARA MICHAL Board President
KELLEY SPURGEON VICE PRESIDE
CHRISTINE BOGAN Secretary
MICHELLE LEACH Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARBARA MICHAL Board President
KELLEY SPURGEON VICE PRESIDE
VANDALINE BAKER Secretary
MICHELLE LEACH Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHELLE LEACH Treasurer
VANDALINE BAKER Secretary
BARBARA LUCAS Board President
BARBARA MICHAL VICE PRESIDE
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 3 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 30 points above the peer median (45 vs. 15).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.