Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Megan Pottschmidt Board Member
Eric Diblasi Board President
James McNeely Board President
Ashley Smith Treasurer
Leah Schneider Secretary
Marla Sciarra Board Member
Georgiann Coons Board Member
Alison Craig Board Member
Karen Haas Board Member
Sarah Julovich Board Member
Cecily Noelker Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Eric Diblasi Board President
James McNeely Board President
Ashley Smith Treasurer
Leah Schneider Secretary
Marla Sciarra Board Member
Jim Plump Board Member
Georgiann Coons Board Member
Sarah Julovich Board Member
Cecily Noelker Board Member
Katina Thomas Board Member
Karen Haas Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in IN for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 51 over 5 years (improving by 18 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.