Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
33
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 13.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 — — 8.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 8.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 13.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 10.2% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 11.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 14.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 16.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 18.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 21.9% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 26.9% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 19.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 22.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN BUSAROW Artistic Director 13.5% of Rev
ERIN BEAN Board Member —
JEFF BEIGHTS Board President —
IAN BROAD-WHITE Board Member —
CASEY COX Board Member —
EMILY HULL Board Member —
JEFF PEAT Treasurer —
CHRIS POSWINSKI Board Member —
FREDDY RAY Board Member —
ROBIN SIMUNEK Board Member —
JULIANNE TOENGES Board Member —
JOHN URBAHNS Board President —
SARAH WARSCO Secretary —
JENNIFER WESTROPP Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN BUSAROW Artistic Director 9.5% of Rev
ERIN BEAN Board Member —
IAN BROAD-WHITE Board Member —
EMILY HULL Board Member —
DELLA KIRKMAN Board Member —
JEFF PEAT Board Member —
ALEX PLATTE Treasurer —
SEEMA REDDY Board President —
J KURT SCHMIDT Board Member —
JULIANNE TOENGES Board President —
JOHN URBAHNS Board Member —
SARAH WARSCO Secretary —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN BUSAROW Artistic Director 14.3% of Rev
ERIN BEAN Board Member —
IAN BROAD-WHITE Board Member —
EMILY HULL Board Member —
DELLA KIRKMAN Board Member —
MITCHELL MCKINNEY Board Member —
CARRIE MINNICH Treasurer —
ALEX PLATTE Board President —
SEEMA REDDY Board Member —
J KURT SCHMIDT Board Member —
JULIANNE TOENGES Board President —
SARAH WARSCO Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JONATHAN BUSAROW Artistic Director 10.2% of Rev
ERIN BEAN Board Member —
IAN BROAD-WHITE Board Member —
EMILY HULL Board Member —
KATHRYN LEMISH Board Member —
MITCHELL MCKINNEY Secretary —
CARRIE MINNICH Board Member —
ALEX PLATTE Board President —
SEEMA REDDY Board Member —
JULIANNE TOENGES Board President —
NICHOLAS TONEY Treasurer —
SARAH WARSCO Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 43 points below the peer median (10 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.