Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Villemez | Board President | — | ||
| Susan Treer | Board President | — | ||
| Olga Rua | Board President | — | ||
| Ashley Wise | Board President | — | ||
| Annette Hooverman | Board President | — | ||
| Lizbeth Atkinson | Board President | — | ||
| Elesha Wey | Board President | — | ||
| Bruce Piper | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONYA SZABO-REYNOLDS | PAST PRESIDE | — | ||
| ANDREW FOCKS | Board President | — | ||
| SUSAN TREER | Board President | — | ||
| JESSICA BRIGGS | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| HOLLY KESSIS | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| ANNETTE HOVERMAN | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| SIOK LIAN TAN | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| BRENT SCHLONEGER | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 4,310 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 35 points below the peer median (50 vs. 85).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.