Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 39 Fragile Recovery
2018 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 1.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 1.7% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 22.2% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 26.5% 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALAN BARCON Board Member
LINDSEY CREED Board Member
CARLA CUGINI Board Member
LINDSAY DUNPHY Board Member
LAUREN FULLER Board Member
ROBERT HEID EXECUTIVE DI
ALLISON HUTCHINS Board Member
ROBERT SABREE GENERAL MANA
JOEY SCHRAMM Board Member
JAE SNOW Board Member
ARPIL STANFIELD Board Member
JENN BRYSON Vice President
VINCE MARCHETTA Board President
LORI RICHMOND Treasurer
JEN WOHLWEND Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT SABREE GENERAL MANA
JOEY SCHRAMM Board Member
JAE SNOW Board Member
ARPIL STANFIELD Board Member
JEN WOHLWEND Board Member
HENRY ZUCHEGNO Board Member
ALAN BARCON Board Member
CARLA CUGINI Board Member
ROBERT HEID EXECUTIVE DI
ALLISON HUTCHINS Board Member
JENNIFER JAROSZ Treasurer
ANGLIQUE KLINE Board Member
KRISTINA KOCHIS Secretary
HEIDI MALTOMPI Board Member
VINCE MARCHETTA Board President
JEANNINE MARKS Board Member
CHRIS MOORHEAD Board Member
WENDY MORALES VICE PRESIDE
MELISSA NILSEN Board Member
ROBERT SABREE Board Member
JOEY SCHRAM Board Member
ARPIL STANFIELD Board Member
JEN WOHLWEND Board Member
HENRY ZUCHEGNO BOARD MEMEBE
ALAN BARCON Board Member
CARLA CUGINI Board Member
LAUREN FULLER Board Member
ROBERT HEID EXECUTIVE DI
ALLISON HUTCHINS Board Member
KRISTINA KOCHIS Secretary
VINCE MARCHETTA Board President
WENDY MORALES Board Member
LORI RICHMOND Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points below the peer median (25 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 39 → 39 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.