Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.6% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 8.0% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 7.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 8.2% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 7.1% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 6.9% 50 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — 5.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — 7.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 8.9% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 9.7% 46 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GEORGIA PAXOS Executive Director 8.6% of Rev
TODD HERBERGHS Board President —
RYAN FORD Board President —
CHIP CONDE Board Member —
LESLIE IAMS KUNTZ Board Member —
CATHY WYATT Secretary —
JASON BAASTEN Board Member —
ANTHONY BELL Board Member —
KEITH BENNETT Board Member —
H THOMAS HALE III Board Member —
MICHAEL STURDIVANT Board Member —
TYLER EMRICK Treasurer —
DAVID LEE Board Member —
GREGORY WOLFE Board Member —
NIKOLINA KAROVSKI Board Member —
JEFF KING Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GEORGIA PAXOS Executive Director 8.6% of Rev
TODD HERBERGHS Board President —
RYAN FORD Board President —
HEATHER NULL Board Member —
CHIP CONDE Board Member —
LESLIE IAMS KUNTZ Board Member —
CATHY WYATT Secretary —
JASON BAASTEN Board Member —
ANTHONY BELL Board Member —
KEITH BENNETT Board Member —
H THOMAS HALE III Board Member —
MICHAEL STURDIVANT Board Member —
TYLER EMRICK Treasurer —
RACHEL FORCHIONE Board Member —
DAVID LEE Board Member —
GREGORY WOLFE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GEORGIA PAXOS Executive Director 6.4% of Rev
PETER MITTAS Board Member —
HEATHER NULL Board Member —
JULIE RENNER Board Member —
DAN SCHRADER Board Member —
PATTI SCHOTT Board Member —
BRANDON O TRENT Board Member —
CAROL KRIDER VAUGHN Board Member —
MARY VLAHOS Board Member —
JAMES J PATTERSON Board President —
TODD HERBERGHS Board President —
RYAN FORD Board President —
JONATHAN CRAWFORD Treasurer —
KIMBERLY KINGSBURY Secretary —
KEITH BENNETT Board Member —
JAMES FYE Board Member —
LISA GOULD Board Member —
STEPHEN MEARS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GEORGIA PAXOS Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
MATT HALTER Board Member —
JAMES J PATTERSON Board President —
PATTI SCHOTT Board President —
RYAN FORD Board Member —
JONATHAN CRAWFORD Treasurer —
KEITH BENNETT Board President —
GAYLE KIMBROUGH Secretary —
KIMBERLY KINGSBURY Board Member —
STEPHEN MEARS Board Member —
HEATHER NULL Board Member —
BRANDON O TRENT Board Member —
CAROL KRIDER VAUGHN Board Member —
DAN SCHRADER Board Member —
TODD HERBERGHS Board Member —
TODD PORTER Board Member —
ROBERT C SHAFFER Board Member —
PETER MITTAS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 329 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.