Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 64 Stable Stable Watch
2023 Hidden Hidden 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 61 Stable Stable Watch
2021 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 61 Stable Stable Watch
2019 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 57 Fragile Recovery
2017 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 61 Stable Stable Watch
2013 61 Stable Decline Risk
2012 65 Stable Stable Watch
2011 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathleen Lassiter Board President
Dan Haueter Board President
Mary Gray Treasurer
Cindy Wanee Board Member
Christina Capaldi Board Member
Sarah Carroll Board Member
Holly Hanna Board Member
Katie Jones Board Member
Megan Jones Board Member
Mark Kholos Board Member
Melissa Kuttler Secretary
Jen Neopolitan Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 59 points above the peer median (100 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.