Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
53
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 1.5% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT ARONSON Board President —
JOHN HENSON Board President —
LAURIE MCVEY-ERICKSON Secretary —
SHAHASP VALENTINE Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AIMEE BUYEA Board Member 2.2% of Rev
KAREN MURPHY Board President —
ED KEESLING Board President —
LORI LEVOIR Secretary —
ANNIE WANG Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN MURPHY Board President —
MARCIA GEIGER Board President —
KATE COLLINS Treasurer —
LORI LEVOIR Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN MURPHY Board President —
MARCIA GEIGER Board President —
JOHN HENSON Treasurer —
RAINI ARMSTRONG Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,023 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 29 points below the peer median (50 vs. 79).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.