Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
53
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 1.5% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT ARONSON Board President
JOHN HENSON Board President
LAURIE MCVEY-ERICKSON Secretary
SHAHASP VALENTINE Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AIMEE BUYEA Board Member 2.2% of Rev
KAREN MURPHY Board President
ED KEESLING Board President
LORI LEVOIR Secretary
ANNIE WANG Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN MURPHY Board President
MARCIA GEIGER Board President
KATE COLLINS Treasurer
LORI LEVOIR Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN MURPHY Board President
MARCIA GEIGER Board President
JOHN HENSON Treasurer
RAINI ARMSTRONG Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points above the peer median (75 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.