Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 1.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 0.5% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2020 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 1.1% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR ANA JIMENEZ-HAMI Executive Director 1.6% of Rev
DR ANA JIMENEZ-HAMI Executive Director 0.4% of Rev
SAM CHARI Board President
KIM M KASTON Board Member
JOHN TRAN Board Member
ROSSINA GALLEGOS Board Member
LAKSHMI NAMBURI Board Member
NADINE LEVIN Board Member
CLAUDE GOLDENBERG Board Member
STUART NICHOLS Board Member
MELODY WINTER HEAD Board President
SAM CHARI Board President
KIM M KASTON Board Member
JOHN TRAN Treasurer
ROSSINA GALLEGOS Board Member
LAKSHMI NAMBURI Board Member
NADINE LEVIN Board Member
CLAUDE GOLDENBERG Secretary
STUART NICHOLS Board Member
MELODY WINTER HEAD Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAM CHARI Board President
KIM M KASTON Board Member
SUSAN ECHARTE Board Member
JOHN TRAN Board Member
ROSSINA GALLEGOS Board Member
CLAUDE GOLDENBERG Board Member
STUART NICHOLS Board Member
MELODY WINTER HEAD Board President
DR ANA JIMENEZ-HAMI Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAM CHARI Board President
SUSAN ECHARTE Board Member
KR SUBRAMANYAM Treasurer
ROSSINA GALLEGOS Board Member
DR ANOOSHIRAVAN HAMI Board Member
CLAUDE GOLDENBERG Board Member
STUART NICHOLS Board Member
NILO E LIPIZ Board Member
MELODY WINTER HEAD Board Member
DR ANA JIMENEZ-HAMI Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAM CHARI Board President
DR ERIC OLSON Board President
SUSAN ECHARTE Board Member
KR SUBRAMANYAM Treasurer
ROSSINA GALLEGOS Board Member
TERRI VILLA MCDOWELL Secretary
DR ANOOSHIRAVAN HAMI Board Member
FELIPE HERAS Board Member
FRANCISCO BARRAGAN Board Member
NILO E LIPIZ Board Member
MELODY WINTER HEAD Board Member
ZYDA S MARTINEZ Board Member
DR ANA JIMENEZ-HAMI Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points below the peer median (0 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.