Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 9.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 10.5% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 15.2% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 — — 9.8% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 15.0% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 13.5% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 11.6% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 9.2% 50 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 22.1% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 19.9% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 — — 11.2% 56 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 7.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 10.8% 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOURDES RAMOS-RIVAS Executive Director 6.5% of Rev
JENNIFER CARR Vice President 3.4% of Rev
GABRIELA URTIAGA Artistic Director 3.2% of Rev
DINA BARAKAT DIR. OF BANQUETS & SPECIAL EVENTS 3.1% of Rev
CEDRIC WOOLFORK Treasurer 3.1% of Rev
SOLIMAR SOLAS Vice President 2.5% of Rev
ALISON HENEY Vice President 2.3% of Rev
MIKE DEOVLET Board President —
ROBERT BRAUN MD Board President —
SOFIA RILEY Board President —
TIM DEGANI Treasurer —
ZACH HOROWITZ Secretary —
TIFFANY L BARBARA Board Member —
MARIANNE GASTELUM Board Member —
RICHARD A NERI Board Member —
PAULA-ROSE WIHONGI Board Member —
MARK TAYLOR Board Member —
BURKE GUMBINER Board Member —
CASTULO DE LA ROCHA Board Member —
CELIA S DE BIRBRAGHER Board Member —
LYNNE OKON SCHOLNICK Board Member —
LISA MILTON Board Member —
MARIO CORDERO Board Member —
KIKI LIZARRAGA Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOURDES RAMOS-RIVAS Executive Director 5.8% of Rev
GABRIELA URTIAGA Artistic Director 2.8% of Rev
CEDRIC WOOLFORK Treasurer 2.7% of Rev
BURKE GUMBINER Board Member —
CASTULO DE LA ROCHA Board Member —
CELIA S DE BIRBRAGHER Board Member —
LYNNE SCHOLNICK Board Member —
MIKE DEOVLET Board President —
ROBERT BRAUN MD Board President —
SOFIA RILEY Board President —
TIM DEGANI Treasurer —
ZACH HOROWITZ Secretary —
TIFFANY L BARBARA Board Member —
MARIANNE GASTELUM Board Member —
RICHARD A NERI Board Member —
PAULA-ROSE WIHONGI Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOURDES RAMOS-RIVAS Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
TIM DEGANI Treasurer —
MIKE DEOVLET Board President —
BURKE GUMBINER Board Member —
ROBERT BRAUN MD Board President —
ROSE ANN DJELMANE Board Member —
SOFIA RILEY Board President —
ZACH HOROWITZ Secretary —
LYNNE SCHOLNICK Board Member —
DIANE HENSCHEL Board Member —
CASTULO DE LA ROCHA Board Member —
MICHAEL MILLER Board Member —
CELIE DE BIRBRAGHER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 333 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points below the peer median (40 vs. 75).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.