Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
25
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 19.5% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 16.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 31.1% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 19.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 22.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 9.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 9.3% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 19.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 9.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 18.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 19.7% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 11.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 9.9% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES HIPPENSTIEL EXECTIVE ARTIST 16.9% of Rev
MATT CABRERA Board Member
PHIL LISLE ADVISOR
ALYSE BARON Board President
JEFF BETHARD Board President
BARBARA KUNTZ Board Member
DONNA MARVOS Board Member
GANTRY WILSON Board Member
NAOMI SOGNEFEST Secretary
TEREZA SPARKS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Hippenstiel Artistic Director 13.4% of Rev
Holly Bisaha Board Member 10.5% of Rev
Treasurer 1.6% of Rev
John Bisaha Chairman 0.5% of Rev
Alyse Baron Board President
Jeff Bethard Board President
Elizabeth Curtis Secretary
Linda Plass Chief Financial Officer
Barbara Kuntz Board Member
Donna Mavros Board Member
Erin Mike Board Member
Gantry Wilson Board Member
Summer Wiseman Board Member
Nelly Maximous Board Member
Stephen Reifenstein Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Hippenstiel Artistic Director 12.9% of Rev
Holly Bisaha Board Member 10.4% of Rev
Sharon Siegel Treasurer 1.4% of Rev
John Bisaha Board Chairman 0.5% of Rev
Alyse Baron Board President
Jeff Bethard Board Member
Elizabeth Curtis Secretary
Sebastian Gutierrez Board Member
Barbara Kuntz Board Member
Donna Mavros Board Member
Nelly Maximous Board Member
Erin Mike Board Member
Beth Schlecter Board Member
Stephen Reifenstein Board Member
Gantry Wilson Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES HIPPENSIEL Board Member 12.9% of Rev
HOLLY BISAHA Board Member 10.4% of Rev
GANTRY WILSON Board Member
JOHN BISAHA CHAIRMAN
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in CA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.