Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 44 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 40 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRISTIANE K RELPH | Board President | — | ||
| STEVE WILLMAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| TOM FROSTMAN | Secretary | — | ||
| BEV ALLEN | Board Member | — | ||
| ALLIE NEAS | Board Member | — | ||
| DON PINNELLA | Board Member | — | ||
| CHERYL PINNELLA | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOM FROSTMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| CATHLEEN REEDER | Board Member | — | ||
| DON PINNELLA | Board Member | — | ||
| ALLIE NEAS | Board Member | — | ||
| CHERYL PINNELLA | Board Member | — | ||
| DON BISHOP | Board Member | — | ||
| ROLAND WILLIAMS | Board President | — | ||
| STEVE WILLMAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| CHRISTIANE K RELPH | Board President | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 4 points above the peer median (40 vs. 36).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 41 → 41 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.