Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 52 Fragile Recovery
2018 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 48 Fragile Recovery
2016 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 46 Fragile Recovery
2013 42 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 42 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jerri Patchett Board President
Dr Constance Fish Board Member
Marlene Rantanen Treasurer
Dr James Helms Board Member
Karen Morry Vice President
Dr Jennifer Jeffries Board Member
Tina Langham Smith Board Member
Marjorie Claborn Secretary
Elizabeth Leader Board Member
Michael Griffiths Board Member
Robert Ibaven Board Member
Linda Wilson Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix Z9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points above the peer median (40 vs. 13).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.