Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
55
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 1.4% 55 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden — 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 30.3% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 0.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 3.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Leslie Eisner Board President 0.6% of Rev
Darrell Hill Board Member 0.4% of Rev
Roger Woodcock Web Master 0.4% of Rev
John Campbell Board Member —
Richard L Hutchinson Board Member —
James May Treasurer —
Paul Hunn Board President —
Tim Mulroy Chairman Of The Board —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Leslie Eisner Board President 1.3% of Rev
Roger Woodcock Web Master 0.6% of Rev
Darrell Hill Board Member 0.6% of Rev
Paul Hunn Board Member —
Richard L Hutchinson Board Member —
John Campbell Treasurer —
Robert Berman Chairman Of The Board —
James May Vice Chairman Temp Secretar —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Roger Woodcock Board Member 0.0% of Rev
Darrell Hill Board Member —
Paul Hunn Board Member —
Richard L Hutchinson Board Member —
Leslie Eisner Board President —
John Campbell Treasurer —
Robert Berman Chairman Of The Board —
Katherine Young Secretary —
Jim May Vice Chairman Of The Board —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Leslie Eisner Interim PresidentArtistic Di 0.4% of Rev
Roger Woodcock Board Member 0.1% of Rev
Darrell Hill Board Member 0.1% of Rev
Katherine Young Secretary 0.1% of Rev
Robin Preiss Glasser Board Member —
Paul Hunn Board Member —
Richard L Hutchinson Board Member —
Thomas Perrin Board Member —
Robert Berman Chairman Of The Board —
John Campbell Treasurer —
Jim May Vice Chairman Of The Board —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.