Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

"Empowers aspiring dancers to achieve their potential while enriching the broader community through accessible educational programs and imaginative dance performances."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 57 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HEATHER ROGERS Board Member —
Manuel Corrales Jr Board Member —
ERIKA VALENTE Board Member —
Rebecca McGowan Board Member —
Corie Wightlin Secretary —
Jennifer Capella Board President —
Teresa Worley Board President —
Richard Woodward Treasurer —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HEATHER ROGERS Board Member —
Manuel Corrales Jr Board Member —
ERIKA VALENTE Board Member —
Rebecca McGowan Board Member —
Corie Wightlin Secretary —
Jennifer Capella Board President —
Teresa Worley Board President —
Richard Woodward Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Teresa Worley Board President —
Richard Woodward Treasurer —
Heather Rogers Board Member —
Manuel Corrales Jr Board Member —
Erika Valente Board Member —
Rebecca McGowan Board Member —
Corie Wightlin Secretary —
Jennifer Capella Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Manuel Corrales Jr Board Member —
Rebecca McGowan Board Member —
Corie Wightlin Board Member —
Esla Andrew Secretary —
Janet Lettang Board Member —
Jennifer Capella Chairman —
Teresa Worley Vice Chairman —
Richard Woodward Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Chris Cunningham Board Member —
Manuel Corrales Jr Board Member —
Joseph Franz Board Member —
Janet Kressin Board Member —
Rebecca McGowan Board Member —
Corie Wightlin Board Member —
Esla Andrew Secretary —
Janet Lettang Board Member —
Jennifer Capella Chairman —
Teresa Worley Vice Chairman —
Richard Woodward Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (15 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.