Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 11.7% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 5.0% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 8.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 8.7% 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 9.2% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 4.5% 43 Fragile Recovery
2017 6.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 7.2% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 5.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 7.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 7.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 7.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 9.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT MASSEY Executive Director 7.2% of Rev
BECK ENGWERDA Board Member 4.6% of Rev
NANCY JOHNSON Board President
NICHOLAS ADAMS Board President
JAMES WILLIAMS Treasurer
SARALYN WINSLOW Secretary
SHARYN BIRES Board Member
BUNNY LADEN Board Member
VINCENT SUNZERI Board Member
AHMAD THOMAS Board Member
SCOTT YOKIM Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW BALES Board Member 6.3% of Rev
RICHARD CONNIFF Board President
NANCY JOHNSON Secretary
LAURIE HUTH Treasurer
BUNNY LADEN Treasurer
NICHOLAS ADAMS Board Member
SHARYN BIRES Board Member
ASHLEY BRUNI Board Member
JASON FORD Board Member
LLOYD SCHMIDT Board Member
SARALYN WINSLOW Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW BALES Board Member 6.3% of Rev
JENNIFER WATKINS GENERAL MANAGER 4.2% of Rev
RICHARD CONNIFF Board President
NANCY JOHNSON Secretary
LAURIE HUTH Treasurer
NICHOLAS ADAMS Board Member
JASON FORD Board Member
ASHLEY BRUNI Board Member
LLOYD SCHMIDT Board Member
BUNNY LADEN Board Member
MARIANNE SALAS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW BALES Board Member 6.8% of Rev
JENNIFER WATKINS GENERAL MANAGER 4.5% of Rev
RICHARD CONNIFF Board President
NANCY JOHNSON Secretary
LAURIE HUTH Treasurer
NICHOLAS ADAMS Board Member
MARIANNE SALAS Board Member
ROBERT KIEVE Board Member
MARC MCGEEVER Board Member
JASON FORD Board Member
LLOYD SCHMIDT Board Member
BUNNY LADEN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.