Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 6.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 8.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 2.4% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 5.6% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 3.8% 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 18.3% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 17.7% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 15.9% 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 20.6% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2012 21.5% 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 42 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSIMI JONES Executive Dir. 6.7% of Rev
MITCHELL HURST Treasurer
SAM PETROFF Board Member
NOAH RISTAU Board Member
MAUREEN MASSARO Board President
MELISSA GRAY HALLMARK Secretary
JAMIE MCGREGOR IMMEDIATE PAST
BETH GOODRICH Board Member
MARILYN KREIDER Board Member
JASON MORGAN Board Member
SALLY BRANNAN Board Member
MICHAEL LOFTIS Board President
AFSHAN SYED Board Member
ANDY FOX Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 10 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 6 points above the peer median (50 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 54 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.