Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 51 Fragile Recovery
2023 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 19.0% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 2.3% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 2.7% 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 49 Fragile Recovery
2018 18.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 32.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 33.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 20.3% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 29.0% 38 Fragile Gov Risk
2012 34.5% 38 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carin Jacobs Past ED 32.2% of Rev
Karleen Arnink-Pate Board Member
Lisa Lightman Board Member
Travis White Treasurer
Pat Martin Board President
Llisa Demetrios Board President
Maggie Parr Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carin Jacobs Executive Dir. 4.0% of Rev
Leslie Ihrig Board Member
Drake Cunningham Board Member
Cinda Gilliland Board Member
Travis White Treasurer
Pat Martin Secretary
Melissa Masters Board Member
Llisa Demetrios Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points above the peer median (65 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 51 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.