Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
36
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 28.0% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2023 40 Fragile Recovery
2022 30.5% 45 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 21.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 26.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 19.6% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACINDA BOUTON Board Member 15.6% of Rev
JAKE BOLDMAN Executive Director 12.4% of Rev
LISA FUGIT Board President
FRED SELBY Board President
ERIC JAMES Board President
GERALD MELTZER Treasurer
KATHRYN SMITH Secretary
CHRISTOPHER BENSON Board Member
NANCY CASPER Board Member
GABRIELLE CARDWELL Board Member
CLAUDIA HERZOG Board Member
KEN WELLER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACINDA BOUTON Board Member 12.4% of Rev
Mary Barnes Executive Director 10.4% of Rev
Jessica Hall Executive Director 2.1% of Rev
FRED SELBY Board President
GERALD MELTZER Treasurer
KATHRYN SMITH Secretary
ERIC JAMES Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY KESSINGER EXECUTIVE DI 8.7% of Rev
JACINDA BOUTON MUSIC DIRECT 8.6% of Rev
MARY BARNES Board President
GERALD MELTZER Treasurer
KATHRYN SMITH Secretary
DAVID UNKRICH VICE PRESIDE

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY KESSINGER EXECUTIVE DI 10.0% of Rev
JACINDA BOUTON MUSIC DIRECT 9.3% of Rev
MARY BARNES Board President
GERALD MELTZER Treasurer
KATHRYN SMITH Secretary
DAVID UNKRICH VICE PRESIDE
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 8 points below the peer median (42 vs. 50).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~12 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.