Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 Hidden Hidden 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR BO JOHNSON Board Member
LISA BARRUS Board Member
ELIZABETH FERNANDEZ Board Member
RYAN FERNANDEZ Chairman
CYNTHIA KAELBERER Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES JOHNSON Board Member
SUSAN LASHER Board Member
HEIDI RASMUSSEN Board Member
ELIZABETH FERNANDEZ EXECUTIVE DI
RYAN FERNANDEZ CHAIRMAN
CYNTHIA KAELBERER Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 14 other orgs in WY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 43 points below the peer median (0 vs. 43).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.