Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.4% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 3.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 6.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 5.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 4.7% 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 6.4% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 5.4% 50 Fragile Recovery
2015 8.5% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 5.8% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 6.3% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 5.3% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 6.6% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANE GATES EXECUTIVE DI 5.4% of Rev
JANE GATES EXECUTIVE DI 2.8% of Rev
PAT ANDERSON Board Member
TRAVIS YOUNG Board Member
JOHN QUINLEY Board Member
DAN STUTTERHEIM Board President
MATT GERRY Board Member
VALERIE ANDREWS Board Member
STEPHANIE BEATTY Board Member
PAM DAVIS Board Member
COLLEEN MARRS Board President
BONNIE SANDERSON Treasurer
CHAD KASSEM Board Member
KENNY HANCOCK Board Member
RICH MORRISON Board Member
JON RICHARDS Board Member
HARLEY HAMILTON Board Member
DAN STUTTERHEIM Board President
COLLEEN MARRS Board President
BONNIE SANDERSON Treasurer
JOHN QUINLEY Board President
PAT ANDERSON Board Member
VALERIE ANDREWS Board Member
RICH MORRISON Board Member
STEPHANIE BEATTY Board Member
PAM DAVIS Board Member
JON RICHARDS Board Member
MATT GERRY Board Member
KENNY HANCOCK Board Member
CHAD KASSEM Board Member
TRAVIS YOUNG Board Member
HARLEY HAMILTON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANE GATES EXECUTIVE DI 4.7% of Rev
PAT ANDERSON Board Member
TRAVIS YOUNG Board Member
JOHN QUINLEY Board President
DAN STUTTERHEIM Board President
MATT GERRY Board Member
VALERIE ANDREWS Board Member
STEPHANIE BEATTY Board Member
CHUCK VASILIUS Board Member
PAM DAVIS Board Member
COLLEEN MARRS Board Member
BONNIE SANDERSON Treasurer
CHAD KASSEM Board Member
KENNY HANCOCK Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANE GATES EXECUTIVE DI 4.7% of Rev
JON RICHARDS Board President
HARLEY HAMILTON Board Member
JOHN QUINLEY Board President
RICH MORRISON Board Member
TRAVIS YOUNG Board Member
MATT GERRY Board Member
COLLEEN MARRS Board Member
VALERIE ANDREWS Board Member
STEPHANIE BEATTY Board Member
BONNIE SANDERSON Treasurer
DAN STUTTERHEIM Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANE GATES EXECUTIVE DI 4.0% of Rev
JON RICHARDS Board President
KENNY HANCOCK Board President
HARLEY HAMILTON Board Member
SUZANNE HOKETT Board Member
BLAKE BLACKIM Board Member
DAN STUTTERHEIM Board Member
RICH MORRISON Board Member
BONNIE SANDERSON Treasurer
TODD DAVIDSON Board Member
JOHN QUINLEY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 59 other orgs in KS with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.