Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 50 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 56 Fragile Recovery
2019 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Root Board President
Rachelle Gill Treasurer
Brian Sharp Board Member
Heather Schwartz Secretary
Dora-Ann Cash Board Member
Erin Marchant Board Member
Kristen Hruby Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Root Board President
Ann Smith Board Member
Rachelle Gill Treasurer
Denise Carter Board Member
Heather Schwartz Secretary
Dora-Ann Cash Board Member
Erin Marchant Board Member
Samantha Lloyd Board Member
Sami Labban Board Member
John Root Board President
Ann Smith Board Member
Rachelle Gill Treasurer
Denise Carter Board Member
Heather Schwartz Secretary
Dora-Ann Cash Board Member
Erin Marchant Board Member
Sami Labban Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 14 points above the peer median (55 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.