Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 5.5% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 5.6% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 6.9% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 6.5% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 4.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 4.2% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 2.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 5.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 7.8% 44 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 10.8% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 9.6% 44 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 11.2% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 9.3% 44 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RAE GEOFFREY Executive Director 5.5% of Rev
MYLES ALEXANDER Board Member —
KIMBERLY CANN Board Member —
MICHAEL CORTES Board Member —
BOLLING FARMER Board Member —
LESLIE FAY Board Member —
JAN GETZ Board Member —
BRIAN GILLESPIE Board Member —
FRANCES HEALY Board Member —
NANCY HOUHA Secretary —
MARYANN KIEFER Board Member —
DAVID LANCOR Board Member —
JERRY MCANINCH Board Member —
HANNAH MICHALOVE Board Member —
PATTIE MOORE Board Member —
JOE SCULLY Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RAE GEOFFREY Executive Director 5.2% of Rev
RAE GEOFFREY Executive Director 4.5% of Rev
MYLES ALEXANDER Board Member —
DARIUS KEEVON BATEN Board Member —
MICHAEL CORTES Board Member —
SUZANNE ESCOVITZ Secretary —
BOLLING FARMER Board Member —
LESLIE FAY Board Member —
JAN GETZ Board Member —
FRANCES HEALY Board Member —
NANCY HOUHA Board Member —
MARYANN KIEFER Board Member —
CHRISTINE MCGUIRE Board Member —
HANNAH MICHALOVE Board Member —
PATTIE MOORE Board Member —
JOE SCULLY Board Member —
MYLES ALEXANDER Board Member —
DARIUS KEEVON BATEN Board Member —
DWIGHT BOHM Board Member —
SUZANNE ESCOVITZ Board Member —
LESLIE FAY Board Member —
JAN GETZ Board Member —
JAMIE GRAEBER Secretary —
FRANCES HEALY Board Member —
STEPHEN P HOFFMAN Board Member —
MARYANN KIEFER Board Member —
CHRISTINE MCGUIRE Board Member —
PETER POLLAY Board Member —
BECKY STONE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RAE GEOFFREY Executive Director 4.3% of Rev
ILE ADARAMOLA Board Member —
MYLES ALEXANDER Board Member —
DEREK ALLEN Board Member —
MARY ANDERSON Board Member —
DARIUS KEEVON BATEN Board Member —
SUZANNE ESCOVITZ Board Member —
DANIEL GARRETT Board Member —
JAN GETZ Board Member —
JAMIE GRAEBER Board Member —
FRANCES HEALY Board Member —
STEPHEN P HOFFMAN Secretary —
MARYANN KIEFER Board Member —
CHRISTINE MCGUIRE Board Member —
PETER POLLAY Board Member —
BECKY STONE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 221 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.