Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 5.5% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 5.6% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 6.9% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 6.5% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 4.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 4.2% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 2.9% 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 5.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2015 7.8% 44 Fragile Recovery
2014 10.8% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 9.6% 44 Fragile Recovery
2012 11.2% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 9.3% 44 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RAE GEOFFREY Executive Director 5.5% of Rev
MYLES ALEXANDER Board Member
KIMBERLY CANN Board Member
MICHAEL CORTES Board Member
BOLLING FARMER Board Member
LESLIE FAY Board Member
JAN GETZ Board Member
BRIAN GILLESPIE Board Member
FRANCES HEALY Board Member
NANCY HOUHA Secretary
MARYANN KIEFER Board Member
DAVID LANCOR Board Member
JERRY MCANINCH Board Member
HANNAH MICHALOVE Board Member
PATTIE MOORE Board Member
JOE SCULLY Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RAE GEOFFREY Executive Director 5.2% of Rev
RAE GEOFFREY Executive Director 4.5% of Rev
MYLES ALEXANDER Board Member
DARIUS KEEVON BATEN Board Member
MICHAEL CORTES Board Member
SUZANNE ESCOVITZ Secretary
BOLLING FARMER Board Member
LESLIE FAY Board Member
JAN GETZ Board Member
FRANCES HEALY Board Member
NANCY HOUHA Board Member
MARYANN KIEFER Board Member
CHRISTINE MCGUIRE Board Member
HANNAH MICHALOVE Board Member
PATTIE MOORE Board Member
JOE SCULLY Board Member
MYLES ALEXANDER Board Member
DARIUS KEEVON BATEN Board Member
DWIGHT BOHM Board Member
SUZANNE ESCOVITZ Board Member
LESLIE FAY Board Member
JAN GETZ Board Member
JAMIE GRAEBER Secretary
FRANCES HEALY Board Member
STEPHEN P HOFFMAN Board Member
MARYANN KIEFER Board Member
CHRISTINE MCGUIRE Board Member
PETER POLLAY Board Member
BECKY STONE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RAE GEOFFREY Executive Director 4.3% of Rev
ILE ADARAMOLA Board Member
MYLES ALEXANDER Board Member
DEREK ALLEN Board Member
MARY ANDERSON Board Member
DARIUS KEEVON BATEN Board Member
SUZANNE ESCOVITZ Board Member
DANIEL GARRETT Board Member
JAN GETZ Board Member
JAMIE GRAEBER Board Member
FRANCES HEALY Board Member
STEPHEN P HOFFMAN Secretary
MARYANN KIEFER Board Member
CHRISTINE MCGUIRE Board Member
PETER POLLAY Board Member
BECKY STONE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 145 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.