Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization
Overall
30
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 90 Unknown
2022 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 87 Unknown
2021 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 78 Unknown
2020 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 78 Unknown
2019 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 93 Unknown
2018 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 85 Unknown
2017 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 85 Unknown
2016 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 88 Unknown
2015 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 90 Unknown
2014 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 85 Unknown
2013 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 82 Unknown
2012 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 94 Unknown

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pamela Fine Board Member 13.7% of Rev
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.0% of Rev
Alexander Boyd Admin Support 9.4% of Rev
Carlita Skok Board President
Bill Sluzeweski Treasurer
Vicki Wohlfeiler Secretary
Ben Zimmer Board President
Katie Tuohey Board Member
Ellen Sindelar Board Member
Suzi Richter Board Member
Andratesha Fritzgerald Board Member
Kerry Davis Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.2% of Rev

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pamela Fine Executive Director 13.7% of Rev
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 5.6% of Rev
Laura Binstock Board Member
John Cameron Board Member
Kerry Davis Board Member
Miranda Hunt Borden Secretary
Kelly Montgomery Hoy Board Member
Susie Richter Board Member
Ellen Sindelar Board Member
Carlita Skok Board President
Katie Tuohey Board Member
Vicki Wohlfeiler Board Member
Ben Zimmer Board President

Tax year 2020

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.5% of Rev

Tax year 2019

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 11.8% of Rev

Tax year 2018

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 11.5% of Rev

Tax year 2017

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.6% of Rev

Tax year 2016

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.3% of Rev

Tax year 2015

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 11.4% of Rev

Tax year 2014

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 13.0% of Rev

Tax year 2013

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 10.5% of Rev

Tax year 2012

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 14.1% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in OH for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

Overall score has gone from 93 → 90 over 5 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.