Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization ↓
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
—
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 90 Unknown —
2022 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 87 Unknown —
2021 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 78 Unknown —
2020 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 78 Unknown —
2019 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 93 Unknown —
2018 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 85 Unknown —
2017 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 85 Unknown —
2016 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 88 Unknown —
2015 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 90 Unknown —
2014 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 85 Unknown —
2013 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 82 Unknown —
2012 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 94 Unknown —

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pamela Fine Board Member 13.7% of Rev
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.0% of Rev
Alexander Boyd Admin Support 9.4% of Rev
Carlita Skok Board President —
Bill Sluzeweski Treasurer —
Vicki Wohlfeiler Secretary —
Ben Zimmer Board President —
Katie Tuohey Board Member —
Ellen Sindelar Board Member —
Suzi Richter Board Member —
Andratesha Fritzgerald Board Member —
Kerry Davis Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.2% of Rev

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pamela Fine Executive Director 13.7% of Rev
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 5.6% of Rev
Laura Binstock Board Member —
John Cameron Board Member —
Kerry Davis Board Member —
Miranda Hunt Borden Secretary —
Kelly Montgomery Hoy Board Member —
Susie Richter Board Member —
Ellen Sindelar Board Member —
Carlita Skok Board President —
Katie Tuohey Board Member —
Vicki Wohlfeiler Board Member —
Ben Zimmer Board President —

Tax year 2020

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.5% of Rev

Tax year 2019

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 11.8% of Rev

Tax year 2018

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 11.5% of Rev

Tax year 2017

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.6% of Rev

Tax year 2016

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.3% of Rev

Tax year 2015

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 11.4% of Rev

Tax year 2014

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 13.0% of Rev

Tax year 2013

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 10.5% of Rev

Tax year 2012

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 14.1% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 330 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points below the peer median (0 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

Overall score has gone from 93 → 90 over 5 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.