Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
17
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 62.0% 17 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 46.6% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 38.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEAN ST JOHN Executive Director 21.8% of Rev
STEVE ROENKER Board Member 13.3% of Rev
ERIN ROLL Board President
MATT CURREN Treasurer
TINA DYEHOUSE Secretary
GRACE ROYALTY Board President
NICOLETTE J VAN DER KLAAUW Board Member
CECILIA TIO Board Member
MELISSA VOLCK Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEAN ST JOHN Executive Director 31.0% of Rev
STEVE ROENKER Board Member 16.7% of Rev
GRACE ROYALTY Board President
MATT CURREN Treasurer
CECILIA TIO Board Member
NICOLETTE J VAN DER KLAAUW Board Member
ANGELA FOGERTY Board Member
ERIN ROLL Board Member
TINA DYEHOUSE Board Member
MELISSA VOLCK Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEAN ST JOHN Executive Director 42.4% of Rev
STEVE ROENKER Board Member 21.7% of Rev
GRACE ROYALTY Board President
MINET WILLIAMSON Secretary
JOHN MORRIS Treasurer
JARROD ELLIOT Board Member
MONISHA HOUSE Board Member
NICOLETTE J VAN DER KLAAUW Board Member
ANGELA FOGERTY Board Member
COLLEEN MCINTEE Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEAN ST JOHN Executive Director 39.5% of Rev
STEVE ROENKER Board Member 19.6% of Rev
GRACE ROYALTY Board President
MINET WILLIAMSON Secretary
JOHN MORRIS Treasurer
JARROD ELLIOT Board Member
MONISHA HOUSE Board Member
JEFFERSON CM KISOR Board Member
ERIN ROLL Board Member
NICOLETTE J VAN DER KLAAUW Board Member
ANGELA FOGERTY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
17 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 55 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points below the peer median (0 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 62.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.