Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
17
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 62.0% 17 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 46.6% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 38.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEAN ST JOHN Executive Director 21.8% of Rev
STEVE ROENKER Board Member 13.3% of Rev
ERIN ROLL Board President —
MATT CURREN Treasurer —
TINA DYEHOUSE Secretary —
GRACE ROYALTY Board President —
NICOLETTE J VAN DER KLAAUW Board Member —
CECILIA TIO Board Member —
MELISSA VOLCK Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEAN ST JOHN Executive Director 31.0% of Rev
STEVE ROENKER Board Member 16.7% of Rev
GRACE ROYALTY Board President —
MATT CURREN Treasurer —
CECILIA TIO Board Member —
NICOLETTE J VAN DER KLAAUW Board Member —
ANGELA FOGERTY Board Member —
ERIN ROLL Board Member —
TINA DYEHOUSE Board Member —
MELISSA VOLCK Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEAN ST JOHN Executive Director 42.4% of Rev
STEVE ROENKER Board Member 21.7% of Rev
GRACE ROYALTY Board President —
MINET WILLIAMSON Secretary —
JOHN MORRIS Treasurer —
JARROD ELLIOT Board Member —
MONISHA HOUSE Board Member —
NICOLETTE J VAN DER KLAAUW Board Member —
ANGELA FOGERTY Board Member —
COLLEEN MCINTEE Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEAN ST JOHN Executive Director 39.5% of Rev
STEVE ROENKER Board Member 19.6% of Rev
GRACE ROYALTY Board President —
MINET WILLIAMSON Secretary —
JOHN MORRIS Treasurer —
JARROD ELLIOT Board Member —
MONISHA HOUSE Board Member —
JEFFERSON CM KISOR Board Member —
ERIN ROLL Board Member —
NICOLETTE J VAN DER KLAAUW Board Member —
ANGELA FOGERTY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
17 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 91 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points below the peer median (0 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 62.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.