Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
23
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CELESTE ANDERSON Treasurer
JULIE BRUCKELMEYER Board Member
ZACKARY DEVOLL HISTORIAN
VICTORIA DOWNOUR Board Member
TORI KING Secretary
BRENTON LEUVOY VICE PRESIDE
ETHAN MAUGER Board President
RITA MOHLER Board Member
ADAM SCHREINER Board Member
STEPHEN WARNER Board Member
JOHANNA WHETSTONE-LEUVOY Artistic Director
JIM WINEGARDENER Board Member
CELESTE ANDERSON Treasurer
JULIE BRUCKELMEYER Board Member
ZACKARY DEVOLL HISTORIAN
VICTORIA DOWNOUR Board Member
TORI KING Secretary
BRENTON LEUVOY VICE PRESIDE
ETHAN MAUGER Board President
RITA MOHLER Board Member
ADAM SCHREINER Board Member
STEPHEN WARNER Board Member
JOHANNA WHETSTONE-LEUVOY Artistic Director
JIM WINEGARDNER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (5 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 30 → 23 over 3 years (declining by 7 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.