Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 9.9% 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 13.1% 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 25.2% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 20.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 20.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — 21.6% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 — — 21.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 21.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Benjamin Coy Executive Director 22.6% of Rev
Donald Gliebe Board President —
David Hejmanowski Board President —
Thomas Bixler Secretary —
Richard Thayer Treasurer —
Carolyn Asher Board Member —
Pamela Beery Board Member —
Gina Calcamuggio Board Member —
John Eufinger Board Member —
William Fowles Board Member —
Gretta Kumpf Board Member —
Jeff Uhrich Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WARREN HYER EXECUTIVE DI 14.6% of Rev
WARREN HYER EXECUTIVE DI 9.2% of Rev
BENJAMIN COY EXECUTIVE DI 0.8% of Rev
DONALD GLIEBE Board President —
DAVID HEJMANOWSKI VICE PRESIDE —
TOM BIXLER Secretary —
PAM BEERY Board Member —
RICHARD EDWARDS Board Member —
JOHN EUFINGER Board Member —
GINA CALCAMUGGIO Board Member —
WILLIAM FOWLES Board Member —
JENNIFER JOLLEY Board Member —
DICK THAYER Board Member —
JEFF UHRICH Board Member —
CAROLYN ASHER Board Member —
GRETTA KUMPF Board Member —
DONALD GLIEBE Board President —
DAVID HEJMANOWSKI VICE PRESIDE —
KENT KING Secretary —
CHARLES MOORE Treasurer —
PAM BEERY Board Member —
CAROL BRULOTTE Board Member —
RICHARD EDWARDS Board Member —
JOHN EUFINGER Board Member —
GINA CALCAMAGGIO Board Member —
WILLIAM FOWLES Board Member —
AMY PINNICK Board Member —
JENNIFER JOLLEY Board Member —
PAM TAYLOR Board Member —
DICK THAYER Board Member —
JEFF URICH Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WARREN HYER EXECUTIVE DI 22.9% of Rev
DON GLIEBE Board President —
KENT KING Secretary —
DAVID HEJMANOWSKI VICE PRESIDE —
CHUCK MOORE Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WARREN HYER EXECUTIVE DI 17.1% of Rev
DON GLIEBE Board President —
KENT KING Secretary —
DAVID HEJMANOWSKI VICE PRESIDE —
CHUCK MOORE Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 330 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 15 points below the peer median (40 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.