Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 14.3% 49 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — 17.1% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 41.1% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 33.1% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 — — 8.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 7.6% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 7.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 7.6% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 8.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 8.9% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 — — 8.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 7.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSHUA GREEN Executive Director 6.8% of Rev
HELEN ANDERSON Treasurer 3.8% of Rev
EDITH GARCIA Board Member 3.7% of Rev
SHOJI SATAKE Board President —
STEVE HILTON Board President —
PATSY COX STEWARD OF THE BOARD —
RICHARD ROGERS Treasurer —
ALEX HIBBITT Secretary —
ADAM CHAU Board Member —
PJ ANDERSON Board Member —
HEIDI MCKENZIE Board Member —
MAPO KINNORD Board Member —
YESHA PANCHAL Board Member —
GRACE HAN Board Member —
SIN-YING HO Board Member —
ALEXANDER PAAT Board Member —
ASMA WAHEED Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSHUA GREEN Executive Director 5.4% of Rev
HELEN ANDERSON Treasurer 3.0% of Rev
RHONDA WILLERS Board President —
SHOJI SATAKE Board President —
PATSY COX STEWARD OF THE BOARD —
RICHARD ROGERS Treasurer —
ALEX HIBBITT Secretary —
ADAM CHAU Board Member —
IFE WILLIAMS Board Member —
HEIDI MCKENZIE Board Member —
MAPO KINNORD Board Member —
PJ ANDERSON Board Member —
MICHELLE CASTRO Board Member —
YESHA PANCHAL Board Member —
STACY LARSON Board Member —
CARLETTA WILLIAMS Board Member —
JEFF VICK Board Member —
ANGELIQUE SCOTT Board Member —
HORACIO RODRIGUEZ Board Member —
ANTRA SINHA Board Member —
KATE LYDON PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTEE —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joshua Green Executive Dir. 5.9% of Rev
Helen Anderson Treasurer 3.0% of Rev
Pete Pinnell Board President —
Ma Po Kinnord Gov. DirectorAd —
Merrie Wright Steward —
Rhonda Willers Board President —
Reena Kashyap Treasurer —
Brett Binford Exhibitions Dir —
Heidi McKenzie Board Member —
Edith Garcia Board Member —
Lauren Sandler Board Member —
Alex Hibbitt Secretary —
Chanda Zea Board Member —
Simon Levin Board Member —
PJ Anderson Board Member —
Dina Perlasca Board Member —
Nancy Servis Onsite LIaison —
Ray Gonzales Onsite Liaison —
Michelle Castro Student Direct. —
Jeff Vick Conf Liaison —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 17 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 27 points below the peer median (50 vs. 77).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.