Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
33
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA TUCKER Board President
JODY ANDREWS Treasurer
AMY LEE Secretary
SARAH KOHLHOFF VICE-PRESIDE

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA TUCKER Board President
REBECCA WARD VICE-PRESIDE
JODY ANDREWS Treasurer
AMY LEE Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM WYANT JR Board President
TERESA WYANT Board President
LISA TUCKER VICE-PRESIDE
JODY ANDREWS Treasurer
AMY LEE Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 3 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix B1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 5 points above the peer median (45 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 36 → 33 over 5 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.