Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
42
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 8.0% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 5.0% 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 14.1% 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 2.4% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — 2.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 13.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 19.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 2.8% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — 8.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 6.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 6.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 5.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 3.6% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DOMINIC RONCACE Executive Director 3.6% of Rev
ALEXANDER DIAZ CREATIVE DIR 1.4% of Rev
SCOTT FOSTER DIR OF FINAN 1.1% of Rev
VALERIE VAINIERI HUTTLE Board Member —
ROBERT COOK CHAIRMAN —
FRANK HUTTLE FOUNDER/TRUS —
EDMONDO SCHWARTZ CHAIRMAN EME —
JANE BEAN Board Member —
RAY CHEW Board Member —
VIVIAN SCOTT CHEW Board Member —
JULIE DIAZ Board Member —
LUDMILA GOLAD Board Member —
AMELIA GOLD Board Member —
STEVEN GOLDSTEIN Board Member —
BERNARD KOSTER Board Member —
GARY PORZIO Board Member —
SUSAN SCIMONE-BELLINI Board Member —
CJ STROCK Board Member —
HON JAMES TEDESCO Board Member —
CHRISTINE BAE Board Member —
FADI CHARTOUNI Board Member —
DEVRY PAZANT Board Member —
GARY PHILLIPS Board Member —
MITCHELL SACKS VICE PRESIDE —
RICH TAYLOR Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DOMINIC RONCACE Board President 2.6% of Rev
ROBERT COOK CHAIRMAN —
FRANK HUTTLE FOUNDER —
EDMONDO SCHWARTZ CHAIRMAN EME —
MITCHELL SACKS VICE PRESIDE —
CHRISTINE BAE Board Member —
JANE BEAN Board Member —
FADI CHARTOUNI Board Member —
JULIE DIAZ Board Member —
LUDMILA GOLAD Board Member —
AMELIA GOLD Board Member —
RAFI JAFRI Board Member —
BERNARD KOSTER Board Member —
DEVRY PAZANT Board Member —
GARY PHILLIPS Board Member —
SUSAN RUSS Board Member —
CJ STROCK Board Member —
RICH TAYLOR Board Member —
HON JAMES TEDESCO Board Member —
SUSAN SCIMONE- BELLINI Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dominic Roncace Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
Dominic Roncace Board President —
Christian Yegen Vice Chairman —
Christine Bae Board Member —
Robert Cook Treasurer —
Koryn Schermer Board President —
Mitchell Sacks Board President —
Michael Shannon Board Member —
Bernard Koster Board Member —
Jane Bean Board Member —
Hon James Tedesco Board Member —
Devry Pazant Board Member —
Frank Huttle Chairman —
Rafi Jafri Board Member —
Susan Scimone-Bellini Board Member —
Julie Diaz Board Member —
Amelia Gold Board Member —
Gary Phillips Board Member —
CJ Strock Board Member —
Fadi Chartouni Board Member —
Rich Taylor Board Member —
Edmondo Schwartz Board Member —
Ludmila Golad Board Member —
Susan Russ Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 249 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 34 points above the peer median (60 vs. 26).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 42 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.