Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization ↓
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2022 — — 5.8% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 29.8% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 26.1% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 18.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEG BRODIE-IDEKER Executive Director 11.4% of Rev
TOM BAILEY Board Member —
JIM GRAVES Board Member —
LYNN HANSEN Board Member —
KATHY LIBERT Board Member —
DIBBY SMITH Board Member —
STEPHEN JAQUITH ORCHESTRA REP —
JAN STEWART Secretary —
STEVEN CROSS Treasurer —
KATHY SCHROEDER Board President —
SCOTT LANGTON Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUDY ZORN EXECUTIVE DI 11.9% of Rev
JUDY ZORN Executive Director 5.8% of Rev
RANDY SEISS Board Member —
JAN STEWART Secretary —
WILLIAM WADLAND Treasurer —
BILL LORNE Board Member —
RANDY SEISS Board President —
LYN JENKS VICE PRESIDE —
JAN STEWART Secretary —
WILLIAM WADLAND Treasurer —
BILL LORNE Board Member —
JD FRILEY Board Member —
LYNN HANSEN Board Member —
STEPHEN JAQUITH ORCHESTRA RE —
KATHY LIBERT Board Member —
LYN JENKS Board President —
JD FRILEY Board Member —
LYNN HANSEN Board Member —
STEPHEN JAQUITH ORCHESTRA REP —
KATHY LIBERT Board Member —
STEVEN CROSS Board Member —
DREW BECKER Board Member —
SCOTT LANGTON Board President —
KATHY SCHROEDER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUDY ZORN EXECUTIVE DI 11.3% of Rev
DAN CASASANTA Board President —
JAN STEWART VICE PRESIDE —
RITA SERVICE Treasurer —
BILL LORNE Secretary —
STUART FENTON Board Member —
LYNN HANSEN TUSTEE —
STEPHEN JAQUITH ORCHESTRA RE —
LYN JENKS Board Member —
KATHY LIBERT Board Member —
JEFFREY NEILL Board Member —
RANDY SEISS Board Member —
BILL WADLAND Board Member —
JEFF WYNDER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Judy Zorn Executive Dir. 10.2% of Rev
Stuart Fenton Board Member —
Rita Service Treasurer —
Steve Jaquith Orchestra Rep —
Kathie Libert Board Member —
Dan CasaSanta Board President —
Dr William Wadland Board Member —
Bill Lorne Secretary —
Jeff Wynder Board Member —
Wally Klein Board Member —
Pat Jarve Orchestra Rep —
Jeffrey Neill Board Member —
Randy Seiss Board Member —
Jan Stewart Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 280 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 40 points below the peer median (15 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.