Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2020 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 87 Unknown
2019 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 91 Unknown
2018 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 86 Unknown
2017 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 95 Unknown
2016 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 91 Unknown
2015 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 89 Unknown
2014 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 82 Unknown
2013 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 84 Unknown
2012 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 95 Unknown
2011 Hidden Hidden 12.0% 83 Unknown
2010 Hidden Hidden 0.0% 94 Unknown

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KARAKWENNENTA PETERSON MA Board Member
DR JO-ANN S ROBINSON Board Member
DR SYLVIA C BUTLER Board Member
LUCINDA HESS MSW Board Member
SUSAN ADAMS ELSE MS MED Secretary
KIM A BLACKLOCK BA Executive Director
DR ADRIENNE FABRIZIO Treasurer

Tax year 2020

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.0% of Rev

Tax year 2019

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.1% of Rev

Tax year 2018

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 69.2% of Rev

Tax year 2017

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 324.8% of Rev

Tax year 2016

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 519.0% of Rev

Tax year 2015

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 465.0% of Rev

Tax year 2014

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 373.2% of Rev

Tax year 2013

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 1,053.5% of Rev

Tax year 2012

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 349.2% of Rev

Tax year 2011

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 2,009.3% of Rev

Tax year 2010

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 2,745.4% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in NY for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 91 → 87 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.