Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 68.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 68.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 37 Fragile Recovery
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NELI HADJIYSKA SCHOOL PRINCIPAL 15.6% of Rev
VALENTIN HADJIYSKI TEACHER 9.9% of Rev
KRASSI IVANCHEV TEACHER 7.8% of Rev
ILIANA DIMITROVA TEACHER 7.7% of Rev
IVANKA M NIKOLOVA TEACHER 6.5% of Rev
LORA AL-AHMAD TEACHER 6.2% of Rev
VIRGINIYA HINKOVA HINOVA-DIDONATO TEACHER 4.8% of Rev
MARIA FUCHEDJIEVA TEACHER 4.8% of Rev
DIMA OKEEFE TEACHER 3.0% of Rev
EVA MENASHE-GENDELL TEACHER 1.5% of Rev
VANESSA POJARLIEVA TEACHER 1.5% of Rev
Velina Belenozova HELPER 1.0% of Rev
Margarita Beshkova HELPER 0.6% of Rev

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NELI HADJIYSKA SCHOOL PRINCIPAL 13.9% of Rev
VALENTIN HADJIYSKI TEACHER 10.2% of Rev
ILIANA DIMITROVA TEACHER 6.8% of Rev
KRASSI IVANCHEV TEACHER 6.4% of Rev
LORA AL-AHMAD TEACHER 5.4% of Rev
IVANKA M NIKOLOVA TEACHER 5.1% of Rev
MARIA FUCHEDJIEVA TEACHER 3.8% of Rev
VIRGINIYA HINKOVA HINOVA-DIDONATO TEACHER 2.7% of Rev
DIMA OKEEFE TEACHER 2.3% of Rev
EVA MENASHE-GENDELL TEACHER 2.0% of Rev
VANESSA POJARLIEVA TEACHER 1.4% of Rev
Asya Grozdanova TEACHER 0.7% of Rev
Margarita Beshkova HELPER 0.6% of Rev
Velina Belenozova HELPER 0.5% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (10 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 29 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.