Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2021 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 20.4% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 16.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WENDY PURVIANCE Board President
HEATHER GEIGER Secretary
ERIN TIDMARSH Board President
CONNIE WILKINSON Treasurer
CHRISTIAN CLARNO Board Member
NATALIA NORIEGA Board Member
TERRI KAHN Board Member
KAREN KAHN Board Member
SANDY SCHWARER Board Member
DEREK TODD Board Member
ROBERT MYERS Board Member
PETER CONTI Board Member
GAVIN HANNEGAN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRONWYN KEITH Board President
JAVIER MONGE Treasurer
RENEE VAN NIEL Board President
SALLY DEVERAUX Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAVIER MONGE Treasurer
RENEE VAN NIEL Board President
SALLY DERERAUX Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points above the peer median (65 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.