Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 46 Fragile Recovery
2023 35 Fragile Recovery
2022 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIC SZCZEPANSKI Board President
PAUL SCHELLER Board President
MIKE MICELI Treasurer
LINDA FOREMAN Secretary
CARL PEARSON Board Member
JERRY SPALDING Board Member
KATHY KORTGE Board Member
PATRICIA VALENTINE Board Member
DENIS BROWN Board Member
JORDAN BROWN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Eric Szczepanski Board President
Paul Scheller Board President
Mike Miceli Treasurer
Linda Foreman Secretary
Carl Pearson Board Member
Jerry Spalding Board Member
Kathy Kortge Board Member
Patricia Valentine Board Member
Denis Brown Board Member
Jordan Brown Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Eric Szczepanski Board President
Paul Scheller Board President
Mike Miceli Treasurer
Linda Foreman Secretary
Carl Pearson Board Member
Jerry Spalding Board Member
Kathy Kortge Board Member
Patricia Valentine Board Member
Denis Brown Board Member
Jordan Brown Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 4 points above the peer median (45 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.