Mission Drift
What does this mean?
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
The Path Forward
The Lodestar
A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | — | — | — | 42 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 19 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 38 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | 26.2% | 26 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 35 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 35 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert C Zapanta | Board Member | — | ||
| Nick Koutisimotus | Board Member | — | ||
| Christina C Cox | Board President | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Schhotte | Board Member | — | ||
| Albert C Zapanta | Board Member | — | ||
| Nick Kuitsomitis | Secretary | — | ||
| Christine A Cox | Board President | — | ||
| Timothy Barton | Treasurer | — | ||
| Christine A Cox | Board President | — | ||
| Timothy Barton | Treasurer | — | ||
| Nick Kuitsomitis | Secretary | — | ||
| John Schhotte | Board Member | — | ||
| Albert C Zapanta | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Fewer than 3 peers found in NJ for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.
5-year trend: Mission Drift
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
Overall score has gone from 26 → 42 over 5 years (improving by 16 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.