Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 7.6% 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Antonia Scearce Board President 3.4% of Rev
Kathleen Cox Board President
David Long Board Member
Cynthia Head Board Member
Lonnie Daniels Board Member
Sarah Denny Board Member
Josh Couts Board Member
Quentin Hammock Board Member
Sarah Maynard Board Member
Nathan Stelter Board Member
Jessica Dryer Board Member
Kristin Haines Board Member
Melissa Mann Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathleen Cox Board President
David Long Board Member
Antonia Scearce Board President
Cynthia Head Treasurer
Lonnie Daniels Board Member
Sarah Denny Board Member
Josh Couts Board Member
Quentin Hammock Board Member
Sarah Maynard Board Member
Nathan Stelter Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points above the peer median (75 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 51 over 5 years (improving by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.